← 输入框|github.com|刷新
Skip to content

feat(core): structural pseudo-classes and :root - #11531

Open
triniwiz wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
feat/css-structural-pseudo-classes
Open

triniwiz wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
feat/css-structural-pseudo-classes

Conversation

@triniwiz

@triniwiz triniwiz commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR Checklist

What is the current behavior?

:first-child, :last-child, :nth-child(), :root and the other structural pseudo-classes are treated as states a view reports, like :active, and no view ever reports them, so they never match. CSS frameworks rely on them heavily: Bootstrap uses :first-child/:last-child about 300 times (the ends of list groups, button and input groups, cards), Tailwind's first:, last:, odd: and even: variants compile to them, and both declare their custom properties on :root.

What is the new behavior?

  • :first-child, :last-child, :only-child, :nth-child(an+b), :nth-last-child(an+b) and the -of-type forms match from the view's position among its parent's children, using the parent's getChildIndex/getChildAt/getChildrenCount as the sibling combinators do. odd, even, 3, 2n+1, -n+3 are supported; :nth-child(an+b of S) is not and drops the selector.
  • A layout re-matches the siblings a change can affect. Selectors that look back are flagged like + and ~ (so the existing insertChild/removeChild invalidation covers them). Selectors that look forward (:last-child, :nth-last-child(), :last-of-type) get matching flags (hasNextSiblingSelectors, hasFollowingSiblingSelectors), and addChild/insertChild/removeChild re-match the views before the change. Scopes without such selectors do no extra work.
  • :root matches the application's root view and each modal's root view (the views core gives the ns-root and ns-modal classes), with the specificity of a pseudo-class.

Tests: css-structural-pseudo.spec.ts (10: matching, formulas, combinations with :not()/:is(), dependency flags, and re-matching on append/insert/remove in a StackLayout) and :root cases in css-selector.spec.ts.

Verified with all of these core PRs merged together (#11527–#11537): apps/automated passes on the iOS 26.4 simulator (1830 OK, 0 failed) and on an Android API 36 emulator (1692 OK; the one failure is the network-dependent IMAGE-CACHE.test_ImageCache_ValidUrl timeout, which also passes on reruns).

`:first-child`, `:last-child`, `:only-child`, `:nth-child()`,
`:nth-last-child()` and the `-of-type` forms now match from a view's
position among its parent's children. They were treated as states a
view reports, like `:active`, and no view ever reported them, so CSS
frameworks' rules for the ends of lists, button groups and cards (and
Tailwind's `first:`/`last:`/`odd:` variants) never applied.

Matching reuses the parent's getChildIndex/getChildAt/getChildrenCount,
as the sibling combinators do, and a layout re-matches the siblings a
change can affect: selectors that look back are flagged like `+` and
`~`, and the ones that look forward (`:last-child`,
`:nth-last-child()`) get the same treatment for the views before an
added or removed child. `:nth-child(an+b of S)` is not supported.
`:root` matches the application's root view and each modal's root view
(the views core gives the `ns-root` and `ns-modal` classes), with the
specificity of a pseudo-class. CSS frameworks declare their custom
properties and base styles on `:root`; core used to treat it as a state
no view reported, so none of them applied.
@nx-cloud

nx-cloud Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 0d88e51

Command Status Duration Result
nx test apps-automated -c=android ✅ Succeeded 2m 56s View ↗
nx run-many --target=test --configuration=ci --... ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗

💡 Verify your cache is correct by running tasks in a sandbox. Read docs ↗


☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2026-10-15 20:40:06 UTC

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-new Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nativescript/core@11531
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nativescript/vite@11531
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nativescript/webpack@11531

commit: 0d88e51

@edusperoni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The main reason these were never implemented is because of performance and walking the tree. I'd hold off on this until we improve our CSS engine

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants