Repository navigation
Use JDK atomic move to more closely emulate POSIX rename. - #5356
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Fixes jruby#5318. Note that this no longer does the explicit file store check, because that failed in an unrelated way when running under a FreeBSD jail. Instead this now relies on the Files subsystem of JDK to percolate out the original error message, which we should detect properly and turn into EXDEV.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #5318.
Note that this no longer does the explicit file store check,
because that failed in an unrelated way when running under a
FreeBSD jail. Instead this now relies on the Files subsystem of
JDK to percolate out the original error message, which we should
detect properly and turn into EXDEV.