Currently the `type` parameter requires a fully-qualified interface. We'd like to see support `type=Function`, `type=Computer` and `type=Inplace#` which expand to the appropriate interface. The `Inplace` number would be which parameter is being modified, as the number of parameters is deducible from the function. Ideally, annotated methods with a return value wouldn't need a `type` parameter at all. But support for `Function` would still be nice.
Activity
Merge pull request #102 from scijava/scijava/scijava-ops-engine/parse…